Are South Korea’s alerts too revealing?


As South Korea battles a snowballing number of Covid-19 cases, the government is letting people know if they were in the vicinity of a patient. But the volume of information has led to some awkward moments and now there is as much fear of social stigma as of illness, as Hyung Eun Kim of BBC News Korean reports.

As I sit at home, my phone beeps alarmingly with emergency alerts.

“A 43-year-old man, resident of Nowon district, tested positive for coronavirus,” it says.

“He was at his work in Mapo district attending a sexual harassment class. He contracted the virus from the instructor of the class.”

A series of alerts then chronicle where the men had been, including a bar in the area until 11:03 at night.

These alerts arrive all day, every day, telling you where an infected person has been – and when. You can also look up the information on the Ministry of Health and Welfare website.

No names or addresses are given, but some people are still managing to connect the dots and identify people. The public has even decided two of the infected were having an affair.

And, even if patients are not outright identified, they’re facing judgement – or ridicule – online.

Examples of the messages Koreans get, alerting them to new cases
Image captionExamples of the messages Koreans get, alerting them to new cases

When you search online for a virus patient’s case number, related queries include “personal details”, “face”, “photo”, “family” – or even “adultery”.

Some online users are commenting that “I had no idea so many people go to love motels” – the by-the-hour hotels popular with couples.

They are also joking that people cheating on their spouses are known to be keeping a low profile these days.

One recent alert concerned a woman, aged 27, who works at the Samsung plant in Gumi. It said that at 11:30 at night on 18 February she visited her boyfriend, who had attended the gathering of religious sect Shincheonji, the single biggest source of infections in the country.

City mayor Jang Se-yong further revealed on Facebook that her surname was Cha. Panicked Gumi residents commented on his post: “Tell us the name of her apartment building.”

“Please do not spread my personal information,” the woman later wrote on Facebook.

“I am so sorry for my family and friends who would get hurt, and it’s too hard for me psychologically, more than (physical pain).”

“We’re often persecuted”: Spokesman for virus-hit S Korean church defends secrecy

South Korean laws on managing and publicly sharing information on patients of infectious diseases changed significantly after the Mers outbreak in 2015.

South Korea had the second-largest number of Mers cases after Saudi Arabia. At the time, the government was criticised for withholding information, such as where the patients had been.

After that, the laws were amended to empower investigators.

“We know that it is [in the] the territory of important personal data,” Goh Jae-young, an official at the Korea Centers for Disease Control Prevention, told BBC Korean.

“At first we interview the patients and try to gather information, emphasising that this affects the health and safety of the entire people.

“Then to fill in the areas they perhaps haven’t told us, and also to verify, we use GPS data, surveillance camera footage, and credit card transactions to recreate their route a day before their symptoms showed.”

Mr Goh emphasises that they do not reveal every place a patient has been.

“We share with the public only places where there was close contact or infections could have spread – like where there are many people, where the patient was known to have not worn a mask.”

Sometimes they have to reveal the name of specific store, too – which leads to closure for certain time and financial loss to the business owner.

Read more at BBC News


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.